![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
February 19, 2008
"O" Tissue Ring "It's so simple and clean and clever," Robert Probst said of the "O" Tissue Ring. "This is the best method I've ever seen of removing a tissue. It comes out perfect every time." For a graduate thesis assignment, Scott Christensen, an industrial-design senior at New York's Pratt Institute, explored the limits of extreme reduction. How little is needed for a product to function well? Christensen fixated on a tiny frustration: digging inside a tissue box for the tissue that doesn't pop up. He learned that a tissue stack requires a slight pressure to engage the interlocking folds, allowing sheets to emerge one after another. The action works best, however, when the box is full, and becomes less reliable as the tissues are depleted. After investigating alternative containers, Christensen realized that a box wasn't necessary at all. Why couldn't a simple ring resting on top of a bare tissue stack do the job? He experimented with various shapes and sizes. If the ring was too small, the tissues jammed; if it was too heavy, they tore; if it was too large, the design lost visual appeal. Christensen settled on a polished stainless-steel ring that offers consistent performance. Moreover, it reduces waste by eliminating the box. Duane Smith was so impressed with the concept that he scooped it up for his Boston firm, Vessel Inc., which will start manufacturing and distributing "O" in October. "You can see a lot of complex exploration reduced to the absolute essence," he said. With a first commission under his belt, Christensen is gearing up for the next. "I've been obsessed with redesigning everyday objects for a long time," he says. "I went back to school to study design because I wanted to share that obsession with a larger audience than just my family and friends. I have a lot more on the way." q & a with scott christensen Your conclusion that the tissue box wasn't even necessary is groundbreaking. Was this purely by chance? How did you conclude that a circular hole, rather than a square or other type of opening, was optimal? How would you handle dust and dirt that will collect on the tissues? Why polished stainless steel? Do you generally seek minimal or environmentally sound solutions?
next » |
|
|||||||